International Journal of
Information and Education Technology

Editor-In-Chief: Prof. Jon-Chao Hong
Frequency: Monthly
ISSN: 2010-3689 (Online)
E-mali: editor@ijiet.org

OPEN ACCESS
2.8
CiteScore
IJIET 2025 Vol.15(3): 478-487
doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.3.2259

Exploring Student Acceptance of Virtual Laboratory in Learning: The Role of Perceived Relevance and Information Technology Experience

Doni Tri Putra Yanto1, Ganefri1,*, Sukardi1, Hendra Hidayat2, Hermi Zaswita3, Jelpapo Putra Yanto4, and Maryatun Kabatiah5
1. Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
2. Electronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
3. English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
4. Chemistry Master’s Degree Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
5. Civic Education Study Program, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia
Email: donitriputra@ft.unp.ac.id (D.T.P.Y.); ganefri@unp.ac.id (G.); sukardiunp@ft.unp.ac.id (S.); hendra_hidayat@ft.unp.ac.id (H.H.); hermizaswita@fbs.unp.ac.id (H.Z.); jelpapo.putra.yanto-2020@fst.unair.ac.id (J.P.Y); maryatunkabatiah@unimed.ac.id (M.K.)
*Corresponding author

Manuscript received September 4, 2024; revised September 26, 2024; accepted December 2, 2024; published March 12, 2025

Abstract—The application of Virtual Laboratory (VL) technology in learning is becoming increasingly popular and rapidly evolving. However, more comprehensive research is needed to understand student acceptance of this technology, particularly in laboratory learning. This research investigates the acceptance of VL technology among Industrial Electrical Engineering students in the Electrical Machinery Course (EMC). Student acceptance is measured through Behavioral Intention (BI) using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework. This framework was developed to empirically identify the factors influencing student acceptance, including Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), and Attitude Toward Use (AU), along with two additional external factors: Information Technology Experience (ITE) and Perceived Relevance (PR). This research employs a survey-based quantitative approach, utilizing a questionnaire distributed to 141 students. Data were analyzed using Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling (VB-SEM). The results indicate that Industrial Electrical Engineering students exhibit a high BI towards VL technology use in laboratory learning of the EMC. PEU, PU, and AU are empirically shown to positively and significantly impact the acceptance of VL technology. Additionally, ITE and PR positively and significantly influence PEU and PU, which, in turn, indirectly enhance BI. These findings have important implications for laboratory learning development, and integrating VL and hands-on laboratory. This research underscores the importance of considering factors within the TAM framework and the complementary roles of PR and ITE in designing, developing, selecting, and implementing VL technologies.

Keywords—virtual laboratory technology, student acceptance, technology acceptance model, IT experience, perceived relevance


[PDF]

Cite: Doni Tri Putra Yanto, Ganefri, Sukardi, Hendra Hidayat, Hermi Zaswita, Jelpapo Putra Yanto, and Maryatun Kabatiah, "Exploring Student Acceptance of Virtual Laboratory in Learning: The Role of Perceived Relevance and Information Technology Experience," International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 478-487, 2025.


Copyright © 2025 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Menu